Skip to content
Varick Agents
All case studies

Professional ServicesGlobal Professional Services Firm

Varick's Agents cut the cost of each invoice from $13 to $6.

The scoped pilot found a $5 task that was a $13 process, and $15M to $33M a year of value at stake across the 4 workflows.

Annual value, minimum
$15M+
Working capital released once
$70M
Hours released a year
92,000
A man looking out of an office window over the city

The agent at work

Watch the agent take action

The client

A global professional services firm with about 300 legal entities in about 50 jurisdictions and 36 currencies. Finance runs on Microsoft Dynamics 365. Approvals move through Outlook, Adobe Acrobat Sign, and Slack.

The engagement

Four workflows were in scope, each priced against the firm's own figures:

  • Accounts payable: 4,000 invoices a month and 350 approvers.
  • Client billing: about 70 billers prepare 7,500 draft invoices a month, through a 10-day partner review.
  • Bank reconciliation: 350 a month, each built by hand, with $15.5M open.
  • Opening new work: won work cannot be billed until someone sets up the project by hand, 6,000 times a year.

What the pilot found

Two forward-deployed engineers ran a 4-week pilot. They studied the records and interviewed the people who do the work. At the start, 36% of invoices were paid late, clients paid in 58 days on average, revenue leakage was 6.1% of billings, and the month-end close took 10 days. Accounts payable ran 17 steps across 6 owners, with 6 rework loops. Four of those steps and 2 of the loops appeared in no interview or procedure.

  • Invoices were routed by a rule nobody had written down. The records showed it.
  • About 60 to 70 invoices a week went to the wrong approver and had to be sent on again.
  • Almost every payment run fell on one weekday, though nobody described a schedule.

Accounts payable charged $5 to each invoice. Counting the work in all 6 departments it touched, an invoice cost $13.

The redesign

Accounts payable was the focus. It now runs on 4 agents with 3 decisions left to people. Agents fix matching and coding problems before an invoice goes for approval, so nobody chases approvers or reroutes invoices. About 500 invoices a month still need a person. The straight-through rate below counts invoices cleared with no human correction. The $6 includes ongoing support and maintenance.

Fig. 1, One supplier invoice, before and after

Before17 steps, 6 owners, 6 loops

11 days

After7 steps, 3 human decisions, 1 loop

3 days

  • Manual step
  • Agent step
  • Person decides
  • Rework loop
Accounts payable, before and after

Process steps

Before
17
After
7
Change
59% fewer

Cycle time

Before
11 days
After
3 days
Change
73% shorter

Exception loops

Before
6
After
1
Change
83% fewer

Straight-through rate

Before
18%
After
87%
Change
+69 pts

Invoices a month needing a person

Before
~3,300
After
~500
Change
85% fewer

Cost per invoice

Before
$13
After
$6
Change
54% lower

4 weeks of discovery, then 4 weeks of deployment

  • Weeks 1 to 4, discovery: the pilot above maps the process, interviews the team, and sets the baseline for every figure on this page.
  • Week 5, build: the agents are built on the redesigned process, the routing rule, and the approval matrix.
  • Week 6, shadow: the agents work live invoices with read-only access, and their results are compared with the team's.
  • Week 7, validate: the agents are tested on 3 months of past exceptions, and the accounts payable manager and the controller sign off.
  • Week 8, deploy: live in Dynamics 365, in the firm's own environment, with every action logged.
  • From week 8, train: the engineers stay on site with the team and the approvers, and improve the coding from every correction.

What the agent does

  • Each morning the agent works the invoice queue in Dynamics 365. Clean invoices post on their own.
  • When an invoice cannot post, for example because its cost center is closed, the agent stops. It never guesses.
  • It asks the budget owner in Slack, with the purchase order and the match attached.
  • The budget owner replies. The agent posts the invoice and saves the reply on the record.

Results

The value below covers all 4 workflows, against the pilot baseline. Clients pay in 41 days instead of 58, because each invoice goes out once, complete and correct. Revenue leakage falls from 6.1% of billings to 5.7%. The month-end close takes 7 days instead of 10. Faster payment also releases about $70M of cash once, which the annual value does not count.

Where the annual value comes from

Capacity released

Annual value
$6.2M
How
92,000 hours at $67 fully loaded

Revenue recovered

Annual value
$6.0M
How
0.4 points of leakage on annual billings

Working capital carry

Annual value
$2.8M
How
17 days of DSO, carried at 4.0%

Total

Annual value
$15M
How
The minimum of the $15M to $33M a year at stake across the 4 workflows

What stays with people

Agents never make the final call on money. The accounts payable manager approves exceptions and releases payment runs. Treasury sends every wire, the controller owns every change to a control, and partners approve every bill before it reaches a client. Every agent action records the rule, the evidence, and the approval. A wrong posting is reversed the same way a person's would be.

More case studies

See what Varick changes elsewhere